Practical Sales Training™ > How To Lose The Sale > Naming The Competition
Naming The Competition
It feels like a confident move. You name a competitor, explain why you are better, and wait for the buyer to be impressed. But often the opposite happens. The moment you mention a rival, the buyer starts thinking about them. And that thought is one you put there.
Naming the Competition is one of those habits that feels smart but often creates problems. Every time you bring up another option, you remind the buyer that other options exist. And buyers who were not thinking about alternatives may start to wonder if they should be.
So it is worth knowing exactly when mentioning a rival helps, when it hurts, and how to handle it when the question comes up.
What Is Naming The Competition?
Naming the Competition is when a seller mentions a specific rival during a sales conversation or in marketing. The intention is usually to draw a comparison. The hope is that the comparison favours the seller.
However, the effect is not always what the seller intended. Mentioning a competitor makes them more visible in the buyer’s mind. So what started as positioning can quickly become promotion – for the rival, not for you.
Also, comparisons invite further comparison. Once a buyer starts thinking about one competitor, they often start wondering about others too. As a result, a conversation that was moving toward a decision can open up into a wider search. And that slows everything down.
Why Does Naming The Competition Cause Problems?
The core issue is attention. In a sales conversation, you want the buyer focused on their problem and your solution. But the moment you introduce a third party, focus splits. The buyer is now thinking about at least two options. That extra thinking creates doubt rather than confidence.
There is also a credibility risk. When a seller criticises a competitor, buyers often read it as insecurity. It suggests the seller feels threatened. And a seller who feels threatened is harder to trust.
Research on choice overload shows that more options make decisions harder, not easier. So naming a rival does not just add noise – it can make it harder for the buyer to commit. You can read more here: Behavioural research on choice overload.
How Can You Handle The Competition In Sales?
The goal is to keep the buyer’s attention on their problem and your solution. There are several ways to do that without seeming evasive.
Answer comparison questions briefly and redirect
When a buyer asks how you compare to a rival, give a short honest answer. Then bring the focus back to their situation. For example: “They do X well. Where we make the most difference is with buyers who need Y.” That answers the question without dwelling on the rival. And it moves the conversation back to where it belongs.
Refer to types of approach rather than named brands
Instead of naming a rival, talk about categories of approach. For example: “Some providers focus on volume. We focus on fit.” That draws a useful contrast without giving a competitor free airtime. As a result, the buyer understands your difference without being sent to look elsewhere.
Keep the focus on the buyer’s result
The safest move in most competitive conversations is to redirect toward the outcome. What does the buyer need to achieve? How does your offer get them there? When the conversation stays on results rather than comparisons, the buyer evaluates you on your own terms. That is exactly where you want to be.
Never criticise a competitor directly
Criticism of a rival almost always backfires. Even when it is fair, buyers read it as unprofessional. So instead of pointing out what a competitor does badly, focus on what you do differently. Because confidence in your own offer is far more persuasive than doubt about someone else’s.
When Naming The Competition Works Best
There are times when acknowledging a competitor is the right call. When a buyer asks directly, avoiding the question can feel evasive and reduce trust. A brief, honest answer is better than a dodge.
It can also work when the difference between you and a rival is clear and easy to explain. If a buyer is actively comparing and needs help deciding, a clean contrast can move things forward. However, the contrast should always focus on the buyer’s needs – not on making the competitor look bad.
Similarly, if the buyer knows the market well and has clearly done their research, pretending alternatives do not exist feels patronising. In those cases, briefly acknowledging the landscape and then focusing on fit is the smarter move.
When Naming The Competition Becomes Dangerous
The risk is highest early in a conversation. At that stage, the buyer may not have considered alternatives yet. So naming one plants an idea that was not there before. That is a big risk for a very small potential gain.
It is also dangerous when your own difference is not yet clear. If the buyer does not fully understand what makes you the right choice, a comparison just creates confusion. Therefore, establish your value first – then handle competitive questions if they come up.
Also, in complex deals with several decision-makers, naming a competitor can create problems you cannot see. Someone in the buying group may have a relationship with that rival. So the further a comparison can travel, the more carefully it should be made.
Common Naming The Competition Mistakes
Volunteering competitor names unprompted
One of the most common mistakes is bringing up a rival before the buyer has mentioned them. It feels like confident positioning. But in practice, it introduces options the buyer was not thinking about. So unless the buyer raises a competitor first, there is rarely a good reason to name one.
Assuming comparisons always help
Many salespeople believe that comparing themselves to a known rival builds credibility. Sometimes it does. However, in many cases it just adds noise and slows the decision down. So before making any comparison, ask whether it genuinely helps the buyer decide – or whether it just makes the seller feel more confident.
Dwelling on the comparison too long
Even when a comparison is needed, spending too long on it moves the conversation in the wrong direction. A brief, clear answer is all that is needed. After that, move on. Because every extra minute spent discussing a rival is a minute not spent building the case for your own offer.
Using comparison as a substitute for differentiation
Some sellers rely on comparisons because their own difference is unclear. But if you cannot explain what makes your offer the right choice without referencing a rival, that is a messaging problem – not a competitive one. Fix the message first. Because a clear value proposition makes most competitive questions irrelevant before they are even asked.
Naming The Competition – An Example
A software salesperson is in a conversation with a buyer who seems close to deciding. Feeling confident, the salesperson brings up a well-known rival and explains why their product has more features. The buyer nods – and then asks for a few more days to look at all the options.
Before that moment, the buyer was not comparing. They were moving forward. But the mention of a competitor opened the door to a wider search. As a result, a deal that was almost done gets delayed. And during that delay, the rival gets a chance they would not otherwise have had.
Now compare that to a different approach. The same buyer asks how the product compares to others on the market. The salesperson says: “Some tools go wide on features. We go deep on making results easy to get to.” Short, honest, and straight back to the outcome. The buyer does not go looking – because the answer gave them what they needed without sending them elsewhere.
See also:
